Lakewood Looks to Amend Law for Marijuana Paraphernalia

City council eyes measure that would bring the city code in line with new state law.

Those found in possession of marijuana paraphernalia — including pipes or bongs — might no longer face serious criminal punishment. 

That’s after a new state measure Senate Bill 337 — among other things — changed the law from a fourth-degree misdemeanor to a minor misdemeanor.

On Monday night, city council introduced a change to the city ordinance that would reflect the new law.

“This is merely to bring our ordinances in conformity with state code,” said Lakewood Law Director Kevin Butler. “We’ve not asked Council to look at any other changes to the marijuana-paraphernalia ordinance, and I don’t expect any additional change.”

The measure was referred to council’s Oct. 15 public safety committee for further discussion.

“Because our ordinances cannot impose a harsher penalty than those allowed by state code, this ordinance would amend our code to follow suit,” Butler said. 

According to a memo from the Ohio Attorney General’s office, the new law “only relates to use or possession to use” marijuana paraphernalia.

A minor misdemeanor means that an offender would face a citation, rather than an arrest that comes with a fourth-degree misdemeanor.

Also, minor misdemeanors typically don’t mean jail time for offenders. Those convicted of a fourth-degree misdemeanor face as much as 30 days in jail.

“I have no insight as to why the General Assembly changed the state code,” said Butler. 

“I am aware that generally, the state legislature has been trying to reduce the statewide jail population; lowering any offense to a minor misdemeanor would serve that goal, because judges may not impose jail time for minor misdemeanors.”

Jason October 04, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Smoke up, baby!
Allison Smalley October 04, 2012 at 01:14 PM
The 'public safety committee' is ok with bongs and bowls but still no pit bulls.....really?
Steve October 04, 2012 at 02:16 PM
They want to get in line with state codes for drug paraphernalia, which I am sure is all around Lakewood, but will not address the state codes for bullie breeds. They must not own bullies, but mst be smoking there at city hall. Now I get it...
will October 04, 2012 at 02:36 PM
I find it funny that there are marijuana laws in cities nationwide about possessing pipes and bongs but the cities do NOTHING about the businesses that sell them because they are labeled "TOBACCO PIPES". A well visited store on Madison avenue sells these in plain sight, mention that they are tobacco and its ok. I support both the right for people to smoke and possess pitbulls. Both are only really dangerous to the levels that are publicly perceived because of misuse or mistreatment by people.
Steve October 04, 2012 at 05:01 PM
I totally agree with you will. But, let us not forget about the media, which SOLD lakewood city council in the first place. The only time you hear of a marijuana bust, is when either of two things happen. 1st- a car reck by a celebrity or public official, and that usually includes alcohol of some kind. 2nd- the bust is worth over 1 million, and they cannot collect any taxes on it so they burn it. But, have a pit bull jump up on anyone giving them a scratch, and it makes 280 news outlets across the nation, labeled a 'mauling'. Those people 'scare me', as does our civic leaders with no common sence to believe everything they hear, without doing any REAL research. Please don't bogard that joint, my friend...
Alex Vandehoff October 04, 2012 at 07:29 PM
will wants to smoke pitbulls? that's weird.
Steve October 04, 2012 at 08:54 PM
@Alex-You really need to get a real life, you offer nothing at the table, except your mouth. You seem to take EVERYTHING out of context. Are you the kind of guy that starts fights in the local bars, just because you can???
Hope R October 04, 2012 at 11:46 PM
As far as the "Weed" thing. I say legalize it period. For those of us really effected by this stupid BSL law are outraged by the constant line used by Council that they won't amend the cities laws for owners of Pit bulls or "mixes of Pit's with too much DNA" to follow the state minimum! Which doesn't even freaking exist anymore! They went verboard even to the original state law, BEFORE it was done away with! They still refuse to change it but on this subject they state they are amending it BECAUSE they can't enforce penalities above State law? PICK a feature Lakewood. We ALL know you banned Pits because of the "element" these dogs were associated with. Drug dealers of a certain "type" or let's be frank color. All BS sterotypes which we proved wrong by showing up ( average owner of these dogs were 30 something white middle classed, educated FEMALES! But NOW you want to lower standard to state law that for "pot smokers" for these offenses which are DRUG related!!!! PICK a feature Lakewood city council. You HAVE to be getting something out of this! We are furious and we are going to let you know about it.
Alex Vandehoff October 05, 2012 at 04:53 PM
Steve, when you start posting about things relevant to the article at hand, maybe I'll start paying attention to you. Talk about not bringing anything to the table. "New Drug Mart plans submitted to Review Board" Steve - Will there be a pit bull section in the parking lot?
Hope R October 05, 2012 at 06:45 PM
Alex you obviously missed our intended point. It's not just about the dog in the end it's about the council flip flopping what laws they choose to Amend and which ones they won't. It's insulting to those of us who were so deeply effected by that particular situation. So it's an example for lack of a better one of some infuriating double standards in our own city council. If you choose to believe it doesn't effect you or won't ever effect you or your family, I think you will be disappointed at some point. I hope not for your sake because it's not something I would wish on my worst enemy.
Steve October 05, 2012 at 08:17 PM
@Hope-Thank You, you said it much more eloquently then me, my friend. The double standards of city hall, can never, and should never be condoned by the citizens who put them in authority. Wake-up people, this has got to stop.
Hope R October 05, 2012 at 08:30 PM
No problem. I don't want people to get offended by us highjacking an article. This article is important. I just felt we needed to explain more about why we highjacked it. :) It has less to do with our dogs and more an example of what has happened in the past by people who seem to pick and choose what they want to do, more than what the people who employee them want.
MZ October 12, 2012 at 12:15 AM
m.z.1 Lax gun laws? Do you have any idea how many gun laws are currently on the books? Do you think that adding additional laws will stop criminals, and if so, why haven't they worked thus far? What new gun law would you suggest?
Patch reader October 27, 2012 at 10:24 PM
I wonder how long it will be before Ohio joins the ranks of those states who approve medical marijuana. States consider moving beyond medical marijuana By William M. Welch-USA Today Three states will vote Nov. 6 on whether to allow recreational use of marijuana. There's still a federal prohibition, and approval would surely bring court challenges. Use of marijuana for medical purposes is legal in Washington, D.C., and 17 states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont. www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/23/marijuana-legalization-ballot-proposals/1642803/


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »