.
Feedback

The Truth About Obamacare

Kiss your grandma goodbye!

Now that the Supreme Court has ruled The Affordable Health Care Act constitutional, it’s time to sift through the embers of one of the great political wildfires of our time and figure out what has survived.

As the political junkie of my social circle, a lot of people have been asking me questions about (the so-called) “Obamacare;” questions like:

“Does this mean Obamacare has passed?”, and:

“When can we expect the government to come to my grandmother’s house to kill her?  She makes wonderful pierogies and I would like to have them once more before she’s gone.”

The answers to those questions, of course, are:

1) "Obamacare passed as a law long time ago, and that the Supreme Court’s decision merely validated it as legal under our constitution," and:

2) “Probably a week from Thursday.” 

Obviously this law is confusing to a lot of people if it makes them suddenly forget the middle school skills of researching for facts, and/or how a bill becomes a law.  But, I can totally understand that people might be confused by what happened with this particular law; so, in case you are someone who’s still a little in the dark about what “Obamacare” is, and what it means to you, I thought I’d take it upon myself to assist in clearing the air about this bill.

First of all, if you already have insurance from your workplace, the law probably won’t affect you much; and the ways in which it will affect you are probably beneficial.  The law includes a “Patient’s Bill of Rights,” which provides coverage to Americans with pre-existing conditions, protects your choice of doctors, allows young adults to stay on their parents’ coverage until they turn 26, forces insurance companies to justify rate hikes, and ends lifetime limits on coverage.  If you’re interested in reading up on these positive portions of the bill, I’ve provided a reference here.  

Secondly, if you don’t have health care insurance, you’ll be required to buy it, or you’ll suffer a tax penalty.  It's an individual penalty, not a tax increase on all of us.  This is expected to only (possibly) affect a total of 7 million Americans.  But how much of a penalty?  Well, the government will first offer you vouchers to help pay for a plan if you need assistance getting on your feet, and the penalty will never be more than the cost of a basic plan.  But if you choose to pay the penalty instead of getting insurance (which means if you have to go to the emergency room all of us as taxpayers are footing your bills for you), it’ll be based on your income.  Current estimates say that, in 2014, the minimum penalty for an individual will be $95 a year.  Buying coverage for the year for that individual is estimaed at about $4,500 a year.  Oh, and if you decide to lie on your taxes and say you have insurance when you don’t, or just decide not to pay it?  There’s really no mechanism set in place to stop you for now, other than maybe the IRS suing you for twice the amount.  But shhhhh….!  

“But Patrick,” you may ask, “all of those sound like really helpful and/or boring things; why is there so much anger and fervor over the bill, then?    Certainly there must be incredible negatives to the bill if people are willing to dress up like Revolutionary War-era soldiers and hold up signs labeling the President a Nazi!”

And, to that, I respond with:  “Well, of course.  Obviously there is substance to that argument, and those people must be correct in comparing our President to Adolf Hitler.  After all, Hitler is responsible for the genocide of 6 million people, and President Obama is trying to save 30-50 million people from being uninsured.  There’s an obvious connection between Obama and Hitler—both of those statements use the word MILLION.” 

But there’s more, dear reader.  They’ve also uncovered the following provisions, which are also part of the bill.  And these are 100% true, because modern day Republicans have no reason to make things up about Obamacare, as they are thoughtful, well-informed individuals with no penchant or reputation whatsoever for simply making up lies out of thin air in an effort to confuse the public into voting for them:

Death Panels:  Sarah Palin caused quite the row in 2009 when she brilliantly uncovered President Obama’s plan to set up a panel of people to decide whether or not to allow health coverage to people based on their “productivity to society.”  These panels will be staffed by people dressed as Roman emperors, who will give a thumbs-up or thumbs-down as to whether or not you will be allowed to live under the fascist Obamacare system.  And it’s a good thing that Palin herself uncovered this part of the bill, because it’d probably be a close vote as to whether or not Sarah Palin has done anything productive in her entire life. 

A Government Takeover of Health Care:  Republicans also uncovered the fact that the government is taking over the health care system.  They’re not assisting in setting up monitored insurance exchanges to help the already-privatized health care companies drive down prices to the consumer—oh, no.   They’re going to unleash their super-dragon, GovZilla, out to smash and destroy Blue Cross Blue Shield, punishing them for succeeding as a small business.   

Government ID Chips:  Emails have been circulating reminding people of the provision of Obamacare which requires all citizens to be implanted with a microchip connected to their bank accounts, including children.  That’s the bad news.  The good news is the microchips have two gigabytes worth of storage so you can listen to your favorite Nickelback album without digging out your iPod.

As always, I hope I’ve helped.  Although the law probably won’t impact most of you, I hope I’ve provided some useful information about it anyway. 

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going over to my grandma’s.  It’s pierogi night.

Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 02:11 pm
@ Solon Bull: Absolutely, you are correct as to 'so called' rationing by private insurance companies. But if there was legitimate 'portability' introducing competition in the market place, along with some simple legislation regulating what the private insurers can and cannot do....plus tort reform, we might have a go at more personal control over our coverage.
Once the gov't controls our choices rather than a 'free market' we become more and more limited and insolvency of the program is inevitable as with all gov't programs. Proper market components in place the buyer has control and can influence the type of coverage they 'own'. With the government in control, we are at the mercy of bureaucrats and a congress which panders first to itself, then panders for votes. That evolves into more taxes and less choice. The present system is lousy. The ACA is lousy. Where are the thinkers who actually address the problems in the present system and offer solutions to them without making us victims of tyranny?
Patrick Giusto July 17, 2012 at 02:33 pm
I admit, that made me laugh; literally, and out loud.
I don't know that I would scream "fire" in a movie theater, but I do love a good discussion. And, if I can facilitate that, well... so be it. In my defense, I hope I at least also have a reputation for not insulting anyone personally by calling them names; which is more than I can say for a few people involved in these discussions.
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 02:42 pm
@John McMillin: It is interesting that you think I have led a life of privilege. I agree that it is a privilege to live in a country which allows me to work for what I have. I could have worked harder and had more....or worked less and have less. While working as a 'Director of Nursing' some years back, I happened to encounter hard working employees and those who would do best to evade their duties. I even overheard one employee discussing how she was trying to get on 'disability' and wouldn't have to work any more. I don't know what that mentality indicates. I don't know if it is lazy or not.
But that young woman wants you to pay her way...so she can do as she pleases when she pleases. I absolutely do not want ANY one to go without basic needs. Even that young woman referenced above. But, if we have a large population with this mindset...what is happening to this country? I can't afford vacations. I wear jeans every day. I buy store brands rather than name brands in the supermarket. My pick up truck is a 1979 chevy and my car is a 2002 Saturn Vue. My son bought me my IMac and my Iphone. I am elderly and I work part time. And I am thankful for everything that I have. But...you (the taxpayer) didn't give it to me.
Solon Bull July 17, 2012 at 03:00 pm
more difficult to introduce a market solution for products that we absolutely have to buy. police, fire,there is no market solution there. we agree that all citizens need these products and the govmt provides. electricity, water - these are regulated by govmt to protect the citizens. imagine a system where private companies decide if they will come put out the fire, AFTER you call and tell them your house is on fire. that is the health care system we have today. govmt wanting all citizens to have health care seems a logical and beneficial position.
bottom line of the market solution argument - health care ins and providers dont want to compete. they will not participate in competitive activities until forced to do so.
Pad Womack July 17, 2012 at 04:37 pm
@Phyllis Stager
The ACA doesn't control our choices rather it mandates pricing and how coverage is returned from premiums. It prevents coverage from being retroactively denied and it puts an end to the profiteering of our health care system by the insurance companies. Any of this information could have been obtained here: http://www.healthcare.gov/law/index.html With regards to where we sit when compared against the other countries you're trying to slam the healthcare systems of, we come in dead last when compared to them. According to this Reuters article: http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/06/23/us-usa-healthcare-last-idUSTRE65M0SU20100623 The most updated study which is referenced in the article can be found here: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Surveys/2011/Nov/2011-International-Survey.aspx Where are you getting these horror stories about having to wait in ridiculous lines to get health care in countries like Canada and The United Kingdom? That's right! It came from this guy: http://www.flgov.com/meet-governor-scott/ Florida Gov. Rick Scott who made his fortune profiteering healthcare, was dismissed from his position at Columbia Hospital Corporation over fraud allegations from the FBI and runs Conservatives For Patient Rights which has opposed the ACA since before the details of the bill were even made public to the tune of $10 mil USD. CHC now merged with HCA is the largest operator of for profit healthcare facilities in the world.
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 05:02 pm
@Pat Womack: I get nothing from bloggers on the subject. Try this article from July 15, 2012: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2174056/Thousands-lose-sight-NHS-cuts-cataract-surgery-quarter.html
Here is the Head Line: "THOUSANDS COULD LOSE THEIR SIGHT AS NHS CUTS CATARACT SURGERY BY A QUARTER." I could refer you to actual Canadians coming herE for surgery, I could refer you to an ingrown toenail in Britain waiting more than 6 mos for treatment. I don't read someone else's opinion or biased main stream media. If you want more...I will get it. I was working in Oxford, England for a summer. I woke up one morning with a painful crimp in my back. I went to the Radcliffe Hospital. I waited about 3 hours, was never seen, gave up and went back to my university room with some self purchased over the counter pain med. YES, YES YES...other countries have health care for 'all'. But they also have limitations in access and choice and quality.... Yes, lets compromise the quality of medical care we now can avail ourselves of to provide for the 30 million/10% of the population which has no insurance. There just has to be another way to do this. Faustian Bargain. I just hope your progeny doesn't come to the point of encountering the disaster heading our way. But some will, inevitably. I just can't comprehend this mind set.
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 05:12 pm
By the way, there were no other patients in the waiting area at the Radcliffe. The health care professionals were just too busy attending to other things.
As to the way private insurance deals with people...yes yes yes...this needs to be changed and the adoption of some of the ACA premises should be enforced on these enterprises. But why didn't we try that, among other things before we were sent into the morass? Congress sure has sure as heck exempted themselves from the ACA along with half the unions across the USA. Tell me...if it is so GREAT...why isn't EVERY citizen required to abide by the ACA rules and regulations? Can YOU opt out? Can I opt out? I just don't get it.
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 05:40 pm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/6359356/Half-of-specialist-heart-units-for-children-face-closure-under-radical-Government-plans.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9365881/Hospital-closures-inevitable-and-NHS-operation-rationing-will-continue-warns-think-tank.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9395071/Patient-dies-and-hundreds-harmed-after-appointment-delays.html http://www.canadaupdates.com/content/more-canadians-ready-move-abroad-medical-treatment-16512.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2124039/Disabled-man-collapses-refused-treatment-NHS-walk-centre-forced-NHS-hotline-help.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1210837/NHS-sack-staff-management-consultants-20billion-cuts.html And so forth.
Debbie S. July 17, 2012 at 05:50 pm
Phyllis Stager wrote (about two comments up): " I don't read someone else's opinion or biased main stream media." Then she cites 3 articles from the Daily Mail, which is a conservative British tabloid newpaper known to put its political agenda ahead of the facts. Seems to be a disconnect there...
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 06:03 pm
How about the Telegraph? Did you read the articles?...they DID give the facts of what was said, done and happened, however they lean. Their report on what happens is what I am interested in.
I don't depend on blogs for facts, only opinions. Wikipedia says the Daily Mail has endorsed some conservative and some liberal positions as the editorial stance has been a mixed bag (being critical of Tony Blair, for instance).
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 06:07 pm
I guess its political to let the public know they ainta gonna get their cataracts removed in a timely fashion if at all. I guess its political to report about how a guy was refused treatment and passes out right on the spot. I guess its political to report the financial shortfall and the closing of some health care facilities and firing health care workers for lack of funds.
Is that REALLY biased reporting or informing the public...really now, Debbie! LOL!
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 06:11 pm
I think its political by the leftist media to withhold such happenings to their public. The public needs to know what their government is 'giving' them.
ian king July 17, 2012 at 06:23 pm
HI Mike - I think the real question here is physician salaries. Most physicians are afraid they will not be making the big bucks once the government starts to limit insurance fees - then next physician fees? I know - I have 4 physician friends. Only one is happy about ACA - this is an MD who does geriatric care - and of course, the lowest paid one too - around $ 150,000 a year. My other MDs make: 1. High risk pregnancy doc makes over $ 350,000 a yr. 2. Infectious disease doc makes over $ 250,000 a yr. and the 3rd. one is ear, nose, throat doc and makes over $ 300,000. this is on top of unbelievable matching pensions from their hospitals/practices; endless drug company benefits and kick backs such as "drug seminars" in golf land Bahamas, beach land Hawaii, all expenses paid/ and then lets not even get into the whole residency "slave labor" they often have access to for weekends off, etc. etc. Most physicians today are the 1% and they won't let go of it easily. They have as a group consistently opposed most health care reform as they see it evading their pocket book/ fab cars/ big houses lifestyle. Drive into the MD parking lot at any hospital and count the Mercedes/BMWs, etc. I have as much education as a physician, am a health care administrator and make no where near 6 figures, with none of their extra, nonsalary benefits - both on and under the table. So anytime a physician opposes health care reform - be sure to ask them is it reform they oppose or the MD salary decline?
Pad Womack July 17, 2012 at 06:33 pm
Firstly, Pad with a 'd' not Pat.
Secondly from your own source: "Mr Burnham said: ‘David Cameron promised not to cut the NHS, but he’s now cut it two years running. ‘His unnecessary £3billion re-organisation threw it into chaos and we’re now seeing crude random rationing across the system. ‘Older people shouldn’t be made to pay with their independence and quality of life." The NHS is being forced to ration healthcare because the conservative Prime Minister and First Lord of Treasury has continually slashed funding to the NHS. Did you read the entire article at all or did you stop at "Thousands could lose their sight as NHS cuts cataract surgery by a quarter"? This problem isn't a product of the NHS. This is a product of the conservatives in Parliament slashing funding to social welfare programs such as the NHS. As for referring me to actual Canadians coming here for surgery, you say you could but you haven't which makes me already wonder about the integrity of your source since you clearly didn't check the first one thoroughly and only seem to have bothered reading the headline. Faustian Bargain? Really? Are you serious? What's next? Sophie's Choice? Pandora's Box? Just because your red herring uses and educated context doesn't make it any less a red herring. I'll wait patiently for these actual Canadians.
Pad Womack July 17, 2012 at 06:43 pm
From Article #1:
"Up to five units which currently provide major surgery to sick infants born with congenital heart problems will be ordered to shut down or merge with larger units after new safety standards are published this week." Please read more than the headline.This is a safety measure to ensure that surgeons performing surgeries are better qualified. They aren't talking about removing services, just about restructuring them to provide better and safer care to patients. If you had read farther you would see that this action is supported by most. The major theme you are missing in all of these articles is that The Right Honourable, Mr. Cameron and his part are responsible for slashing billions of GBP in funding from the NHS. You're trying to blame the NHS for having its funding slashed rather than the people who slashed it. That's like blaming your skin for itching instead of the mosquito that bit you. While I can certainly admire your zeal it's clear that you are not well educated at all on this subject and the best that can be hoped for out of you is to repeat conservative talking points which are not in fact..well, fact. I've come to expect more from the historical alumni of OSU than this.
Pad Womack July 17, 2012 at 07:21 pm
I'm sorry but did you just try to discredit everyone with Wikipedia? Really?
Mike July 17, 2012 at 07:27 pm
In all the debating, did anybody notice that these people with "universal healthcare" seems is based on a government budget, and healthcare can be cut or otherwise effected - whether it be political or economic. As I stated earlier - you trust the next leader / congress / party to leave it be or change it to your liking .... Is that where we want to go? (Or are we to assume it's always political and that it's only being cut because a "conservative" is the PM. If so, I wonder what all that economic chaos is I've been hearing about over there ...) I didn't reaize the PM by themselves had that kind of power. Then again, the current resident of our presidency seems to think he does in more and more instances .... Dangerous path we are steering into....
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 11:37 pm
@ Pad Womack: Talk about an interesting twist..."I am blaming the NHS for having its funding slashed......" LOL!
Mr. Womack...that is what happens when something is run by the government. When funds get tight in a nation they have to slash somewhere...or at least they are supposed to, rationing would be the natural result, less care for fewer people, natural result. And...that will happen here in time to come. We are already over spent in Medicare and SS. http://www.freep.com/article/20090820/BUSINESS06/908200420/Canadians-visit-U-S-get-health-care http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkup/2010/02/canadian_premier_has_heart_sur.html http://www.drhurd.com/index.php/Daily-Dose-of-Reason/Health-Care-Reform/Canadian-Health-Moves-Private-As-USA-Goes-Socialist.html And...there are numerous specialized in 'health care' travel agencies in Canada which do all the negotiating for you with medical specialists and centers, along with arranging your hotel or housing while getting your care outside of Canada. Do you want me to find some of those agencies just to prove it to you?
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 11:43 pm
And as to shutting down those 'hospital's because so many babies died...LOL! In a system that thrives on 'excellence', instead of continuing to exist and be funded regardless of outcome...this would NEVER happen.
Those docs and that administrative staff got their salaries no matter what. It just so happened their incompetence was discovered and d/t public outcry they got shut down. But not until after a bunch of dead babies! Go ahead an pooh pooh it... but it should never have happened in the first place.
Phyllis Stager July 17, 2012 at 11:50 pm
And..Sir Pad...I tried to find an analysis of whether a publication was 'conservative or liberal. There were no available sources. So, I went to wikipedia. I named the 'source' so that can be assessed on its own.
ian king July 18, 2012 at 12:42 am
Hi Mike - your thinking is a bit muddled I believe. NOTHING is ever set in stone regarding finances, benefits, etc. in either the public/government or the private/business sectors. Are you suggesting that we should now trust the private, for profit, insurance companies and for profit hospitals to always provide the coverage we need/want? That there will never be cuts, denials, substitutes in coverages? Mike, not sure what world you have been living in, but every year since I can remember my health care insurance company adds/drops what is or is not covered; while always increasing the premiums at all deductible levels. We have been on a dangerous path with our health care policies - or lack of - in this country for decades. Doctors knew this, Hospitals knew this, Politicians knew this. When I was in grad school in the 1980s, I can't tell you how many books/articles had already been written about how broken our health care was in the USA. And this was almost 35 years ago! Both the private and the public sectors have failed to provide the needed leadership for reform. Time has run out as it was predicted many years ago. Health care will bankrupt this country if it is left the way it is - that is one fact no one can dispute. Massive changes have to be prescribed on all levels and for all players in this business/industry.
Curt Fell July 18, 2012 at 01:36 am
@Phyllis - In Sai Gon, Viet Nam in 2009 to visit my in-laws. My point was that even a poor country considers that healthcare for their citizens is a basic right. I did mention though that the facilities are not up to par with our healthcare.
Not sure why you and many others think that having universal healthcare in the US will end up like that of Viet Nam. It's the narcissistic attitudes of you and your kind that are ruining the greatness of this country. You don't think that we can take the lessons learned from other countries and implement a better universal healthcare system here in the USA? You automatically believe that universal healthcare in the US will become = to 3rd world care.
marty323 July 18, 2012 at 01:46 am
some people still do not understand what debt is.
Phyllis Stager July 18, 2012 at 01:07 pm
@ Pad Womack: GEE. W was just in Africa with his wife doing charity work. I wonder whey they didn't arrest him? So...now all this is about W. I know, I know, if the ACA turns out to be not exactly what you 'hoped' for...BLAME W!!! LOL!
As John Roberts Chief Justice of the Supreme Court said in his decision on the ACA: "Its not our job (scotus) to protect people from the consequences of their political choices."
Phyllis Stager July 18, 2012 at 01:20 pm
@ Pad: Its interesting that you perceive that 'I'blame the NHS for the cuts in care. Rather illogical conclusion. The government allocates the funds to run the NHS as will our government allocate funds to run the ACA. When the government has a problem with shortfall in the budgets...naturally they have to reduce services.
And that, my friend is what leads to rationing and third rate health care. And it's 'Coming to your town soon'. Mark my words. Amazing that you can't make that connection! LOL! By the way....I DID verify the Canadian exodus to the USA and other countries for health care. I DID verify the existence of rationing and poor care in the various 'universal' health care nations. Even the Premier of Newfoundland andLabrador (Canada) came to the US for his surgery (reported by a left leaning USA news organization).
Phyllis Stager July 18, 2012 at 01:40 pm
As to your assuming that I believe the ACA will drive us to end up like Viet Nam...such a jump in logic. YOU brought up FREE care Viet Nam, YOU lauded its 'FREE' care. I simply addressed the 'quality' of the FREE goodies in Viet Nam.
Geeze..you jump to the ad hominem attack, and YOU are a 'good humanity loving' liberal with nothing but love and kindness in your heart. The way you guys look at the ACA is you see nothing but the shiny Rolls Royce exterior. You forget to lift the hood where you will find a Model T engine.
ian king July 18, 2012 at 05:02 pm
hi marty - great point! i wonder if bush/cheney/rove realized what debt is when they inherited the clinton surplus - yes, remember the us government had a huge SURPLUS from the clinton/gore years when bush took office - and completely eliminated that surplus through unprecedented massive tax cuts for the wealthy ( remember bush's great PR comments about how all that money the wealthy would not spend paying taxes, but would instead spend on job/growth creation - "trickle down economics" --- well, aren't most of us still waiting for those jobs for us from those tax cuts to the wealthy?) and while massive tax cuts were implemented, bush/cheney created TWO WARS for us to pay for! so lets see here, i don't think debt is that difficult to understand marty. if you take a surplus, and then cut the sources of that surplus so there is no money coming in, and then up the expenses not once, but twice to fund to wars - don't you think there will be a problem balancing the books? oh yes, but then the republicans did offer their solution = cut all government programs that help the elderly, the poor, students, the unemployed, just not that 1% of the wealthy! great republican leadership don't you think? LOL
Phyllis Stager July 18, 2012 at 05:47 pm
Ian King: The proposed tax hike will bring in about $65 billion for 2013. The nation needs about $8 billion a day to meet its obligations. Do you realize that $65 billion will pay for a little over 8 days to run the gov't? At the same time Obama is proposing an increase of spending for 2013 of $202 billion. It is disingenuous to suggest that that tax hike will bring down the deficit and balance the budget. WHAT BUDUGET...we haven't had a budget for more than 3 years although it is required annually BY LAW.
The accounting firm of Ernst and Young did a study and claims that the proposed tax increase will cause the USA to lose in the range of 700,000 jobs. Your reasoning as to the tax 'cuts' being the cause of eliminating the 'surplus' is seriously in error. Take a genuinely closer look at the reality. Now I agree with you the 2 Bush terms did us no favors economically. The wars did have to be paid for...along with the ridiculous prescription drug fix for Medicare...it didn't fix a thing and costs us. As to the big 'bugaboo' of OUTSOURCING, Obama's personal financial portfolio shows his investment in companies which outsource to be about 40%. For example he is invested in Vanguard 500 Index Funds which hold: GE (out sourcing to India), Apple (manufacturing overseas), and IBM (foreign workers account for 71% of its 400,000 employees). So Axelrod and his cronies should cut the 'outsourcing' crap.
Phyllis Stager July 19, 2012 at 12:30 pm
@Pad...by the way...I am not an alum of OSU. I attended there, got married and we moved to Texas. I finished my degree at SMU. I love Ohio with all my heart and I love Texas with all my heart. They are both wonderful places to live with wonderful people. Growing up in Ohio was beautiful....growing old in Texas is also beautiful.
tomhenrry July 20, 2012 at 09:35 am
You can increase your blog visitors by having a fan page on facebook.
<a href="http://www.city-tutors.co.uk/subjects-we-teach/gcse/geography"><b>Geography Tuition</b></a>

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lakewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
casaderayray June 18, 2013 at 03:28 pm
Where is Storer...East, West, or South of Lakewood?
Regina Milsaps June 18, 2013 at 04:26 pm
It runs east from West 67th to West 34th between Clark to the North and Denison to the South. ButRead More you could look it up on Google maps for a better idea of just how far it is from West 117th and Madison.
Timothy M Bradford June 19, 2013 at 09:52 am
Regina, I appreciate your enthusiasm regarding my listing! If you would like to talk please feelRead More free to give me a call. Casaderayray, Storer is east of Lakewood, west of W. 25th, south of Ohio City. The heading was "just outside of Lakewood" due to the fact that I have other listings much farther out, like Painesville and Euclid. It is a great home with many, many updates - it's worth looking at! If you would like more information please contact me directly at 216-227-3523.
taryn.osborn June 14, 2013 at 01:42 pm
I won't make it there before 2pm, but if you don't sell your drum set...I am interested!
State Rep. Nickie J. Antonio
Sarah Henderson June 12, 2013 at 07:16 pm
I am so glad to hear about this project for those in our community who struggle with mental illness.Read More Thanks for sharing this information, Nikki.
Colin McEwen (Editor) June 8, 2013 at 03:53 pm
Here's the follow up.Read More http://lakewood-oh.patch.com/groups/breaking-news/p/three-injured-after-car-crashes-through-the-exchange
Paul Grimm June 6, 2013 at 09:31 am
They are turning it into a Discount Drug Mart - should open this summer.
jim June 6, 2013 at 10:45 am
i think you are mistaking or being goofy...but sullivans is "was" at the corner ofRead More chesterland and madison, not on detroit.
William Bridgeman June 8, 2013 at 04:06 pm
They are supposed to be reopening in early July as Brew 211, as sports bar with a lot of large flatRead More TVs and basic bar food. The big wood booths are leaving. Sullivan's as we knew it is gone.
Maggie Rader June 6, 2013 at 12:45 pm
Again, while I am very grateful for the outcome for my Mom, I also have a lot of compassion for theRead More other residents. The move for my Mom is only temporary, since the South Westerly will come under the same guidelines within a couple of years. This can only be changed by an act of Congress. I have already written letters to the politicians involved, particularly Marcy Kaptur -- Ohio Congressional District 9. Hopefully, all concerned will do the same.
Duane Hoyt June 7, 2013 at 08:25 am
Marcy doesn't care about Lakewood. Dennis Kucinich wouldn't allow this to happen, but thanks toRead More Republican (Kasich) redistricting, Dennis had to run against Marcy, and he lost. Remember this when Kasich runs against local Lakewood man Ed Fitzgerald runs for Governor.
Ron Dodson June 8, 2013 at 07:10 pm
Members of Congress tack on amendments to bills all the time that only benefit a handful of theirRead More constituents. If there was ever a time for a pork barrel move, this would be it. You're right Duane, this would have never gotten this far if Dennis was still next door to the Westerly.
Lidia Trempe June 15, 2013 at 10:06 am
After two weeks of being lost in Cleveland, Mordecai has come home!! He had traveled 3 miles fromRead More where he was lost. A huge thank you to Eve, who lured him out of a huckleberry bush with hot dogs! He looks great and hasn't lost too much weight, and is being showered with bacon and steak. We hope to be able to pay this forward as much as we've been helped, thank you everyone for your time, thoughts and hard work!! https://www.facebook.com/lostinlakewood
Megan Rozsa (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 10:55 am
I'm so happy he's home now! Thanks to everyone who helped keep an eye on him by sharing this post!Read More :) Patch in action!
Mary Beth Moore June 17, 2013 at 10:36 pm
Thank goodness he is back home with Lidia and fam, where he belongs - yay!!! And the outpouring ofRead More community support for this sweet puppy was amazing. Thankful for this awesome community too!