.

Diary of a Wimpy Party

You don't get a reputation for strength by posturing alone.

Recently, Newsweek magazine had a cover article picturing Mitt Romney with the headline:  “Romney:  The Wimp Factor.  Is He Just Too Insecure to be President?” 

It’s not a fantastic article.  It basically mentions Romney as a flip-flopper and someone who doesn’t represent conservative ideals well.  But, if you’re paying attention to politics, that's old news.

(Frankly, I think I could have done a better job with the topic, but that might be my ego talking.  I also think I can be the ; and I’m still a little surprised that I wasn’t offered a role in The Expendables 2, what with this fabulous physique and suave, devil-eyed glare).

But, I’m sure liberals will enjoy the article referencing the Republican nominee as a "wimp."  I’m also sure Republicans will either head back to their loud, usually-baseless assertion that the liberal media is trying to destroy them, or fire back with some quip about Obama being a wimp himself.  Because, in politics these days, the “I know you are, but what am I” system of maturity we’ve come to expect is both predictable, and one that keeps us on the playground instead of running the school like we used to.

For me, the article fixed my brain on one word, though; and it had less to do with labeling Mitt Romney and more to do with the tale it tells about our entire nation.  And that word was “wimp.”

Democrats are consistently seen as wimps.  I would guess a common assessment of their party, if you boiled it down, would be that their (bleeding) hearts are in the right places but they’re too weak to stand up to aggressors, foreign and domestic.  Their reputation is one of caving in, warranted or not. And, trust me, in the mess we’re in, they are not without blame in the least.

Republicans, on the other hand, are completely paranoid about Americans being seen as wimps.  It may be the entire psychological basis for their identity. Since the days of Teddy Roosevelt the Republican trademark has always been, “Walk tall and carry a big stick.”  Updated for the parlance of our times, that sentence should now be, “Walk tall and carry a howitzer.” 

(Of course, I don’t need a howitzer, what with these “guns” I’m carrying around.  *flex*)

So the GOP does not take kindly to the perception of wimpitude.  Their stance on the Communists was to never show weakness to a foreign entity; and that carried them all the way through the Presidency of Ronald Reagan, the silky-smooth songs of John “bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb-Iran” McCain, and, yes, the candidacy and authorship of Mitt “No Apologies” Romney.   

These are strong belief systems based on proud, patriotic, never-wavering abstracts and rhetoric to ensure we are always perceived as the national equivalent of Superman.

I really can’t argue whether a position of military strength is best as a foreign policy choice.  I suppose the appearance of aggression derails anyone from thinking you’re a wimp, if not opening the concern that they might find you a bully.  And I can understand the GOP’s concern for not wanting to appear weak abroad.

But, you know what?  I think the modern GOP is a bunch of wimps anyway; from Romney all the way down. 

Because, if you don’t want to appear as though you’re a wimp, you can’t limit that distinction to foreign policy.  You have to portray that strength by taking care of your own at home. 

And the current GOP seemingly has no plans for that.

Instead of working on compromise to strengthen the middle class or fix the myriad of broken portions of our infrastructure, they’ve made it their stated, “single, most important goal” for two years now to stand in the way of anything the President proposes to beat him in November.  It’s in their voice, and on their resume:

Stand up to the Tea Party when it came to never compromising on the raising the debt ceiling—which meant paying bills we’ve already rung up?  Nope.

Put forth bills to reform corporate pollution using the cap-and-trade policies they inventedNo way.  Let’s get rid of the EPA entirely.  Besides, climate change isn’t real anyway. 

Raise revenue for the government by returning tax rates to what they were under Clinton, which helped result in a surplus?  Absolutely not.  You’re a class warrior if you believe that. Now look over here while we lower taxes for the rich and raise them on the middle class

Think that union “thugs” are bullies?  No reforms here.  Pass some legislation to do away with the bargaining process entirely.   

Not happy with the health care bill based on a Republican idea?   We’re gonna vote to repeal it—not reform it—thirty three times.  (Also, you’re a socialist for bringing up our idea.) 

Democrats have a jobs plan?  A Cyber security plan?  Motions for SuperPACs to disclose more information?   Filibuster!  Filibuster!  Filibuster!

Should we cut government spending?  Yes!  Yes!  Yes!  But don’t touch the Defense Budget!  Never!  Never!  Never!

Because nothing says “prevent foreign invasion” like a hundred battleships armed to the teeth stopping a determined evil horde from crossing our crumbling bridges and drinking our flaming water, right?

I realize some people think that never compromising is somehow a position of strength.  It’s not.  Not in the long term.  When it goes on as long as it has, it’s a position of ignorance and stupidity.  Nobody in their right mind gets cancer and says, “The best way to beat cancer is to keep my chin up and wait it out.” 

I can totally understand the GOP's concern for abuse within the systems of welfare, health care, unions, etc.  And if they want to disagree with the Dems' proposals that's fine-- that's even expected.

But too often instead of proposing reforms—some of which were their own ideas to begin with—their attitude is to wipe the slate clean, or to never get the ball rolling in the first place.  And they have catered to the Tea Party and Libertarian arms of their party which call for “every man for himself’ instead of a government by the people, working for the people.

Sorry, GOP.  That isn’t the way to look like Superman.  That’s actually the philosophy of the Joker. 

If we really, truly want the rest of the world to look at America and think of us in the abstract as unflinchingly strong, we have to incorporate the way we protect and strengthen ourselves at home.  If we're going to talk about appearances, we can't have a Congress with the approval rating of Howard the Duck.

That means two parties, working together; occasionally disagreeing and digging in their heels, but working towards “how” we solve problems, and not “if.” 

And that can't happen if the GOP is going to be the party of "no."

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

keith a dewey August 06, 2012 at 04:53 PM
Pat, Well written, I am jealous, wish I could write that well. You have just proven how stupid it is for the conservatives to claim Obama is decisive. They are. It’s the sick, calling the well, sick. But, Pat I found out in here conservatives have a real hard time grasping concepts deeper then their cereal bowl. And have a harder time with ambiguities. Case in point: I asked for anyone to name a time when an issue was settled where it was not the liberal side that won. The answer was: “Clinton’s Welfare Reform Act”. What?? That is like saying the compromise of 1851 solved the slave issue. Or the Dared Scott decision ended the argument of people ownership. The conservatives just can’t grasp the difference between attitude and act or issue and event. Then they accuse me of changing the rules and refuse to enter into any real adult debate. Can you imagine them trying to explain; you do not have to compromise your principles but sometimes behave as if you did? Again thanks for your post.
James Murphy August 06, 2012 at 05:35 PM
keep drinking your kool-aid and dancing your party lines like little trained pets and do not be shocked in Janurary when all 3 houses are run by republicans
joe ponikarovsky August 06, 2012 at 07:41 PM
haha. man i love it when someone writes a well-thought out article with valid points (complete with cited sources) and the first reply from the opposing viewpoint is, basically, name-calling and "you'll see!" i wish people who hate obama so much would put forth a valid argument for why (complete with, you know, facts and stuff) instead of putting all their time into creating stupid nicknames for him and creative ways to use his "O" logo, etc... instead they usually just use something like that, leave a random baseless argument and then post it. example: "just you wait! obummer's got gas all the way up to $3.89 now! i can't wait till november when i can fill my hummer up for $20!!!"
keith a dewey August 07, 2012 at 02:18 PM
Joe, you are correct. It is the loud mouth speaking the vacant mind.
Phyllis Stager August 12, 2012 at 01:50 PM
Nothing Patrick wrote stirs me to argue at this time...and arguing is my favorite pass time. As an aside...I want to know why we haven't had a budget in well over 1000 days when one is required by law every 365 days? Mr. Magoo, the Senate 'leader', just tables those presented from the House. I don't understand that stance. The political maneuvering is the weirdest I have ever witnessed. We need term limits for all of congress. All members of Congress need to abide by the same laws as do the citizens. Have you seen the pensions they get? I think when american citizens take a hit on this, congress should too. We pay them to work for us and they really only serve themselves. Well...I guess I have said enough.
bntgrare September 06, 2012 at 04:01 AM
Louis Vuitton once said that he could know what kind of person you were if he looked at your suitcase, we know that makes sense. And after so many years of evolution et development, vintage <b><a href="http://www.outletlouisvuittonhandbagsonsale.com">Louis Vuitton Handbags</a></b> as the most immemorial item in the big House, it has won great popularity, and which is one of the reason why this brand was known by people all around the world, vintage <b><a href="http://www.outletlouisvuittonhandbagsonsale.com/louis-vuitton-watches-c-154.html">Louis Vuitton Watches</a></b> could be dated from the old era, at that time it was closely related to the palace and nobility, so we can image that it must be designed with superb quality and refined workmanship, just because of these advantages, it's allowed to obtain the favor of aristocracy. And nowadays, it's also the best loved companion in our lives, especially the journey and popular stars. Talking about its evolutionary process, there are a lot of changes that have occurred, and we will talk about a little about this subject. In 1927, <b><a href="http://www.outletlouisvuittonhandbagsonsale.com/louis-vuitton-luggage-c-77.html">Louis Vuitton Luggage</a></b> provided some sense of luxury to the tourists.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »